NRM programs are typically designed to improve environmental and/or land management outcomes, but often have multiple associated benefits that go beyond the original scope of the program. These benefits can include improved social connections, farm financial performance, confidence in land management, and health and wellbeing. NRM programs are a natural fit for drought resilience measures; interventions that aim to increase groundcover, increase water use efficiency, reduce loss of pasture during dry times, and increase planning for risks associated with drought have been incorporated into land management programs for many years. These outcomes improve overall resilience on farms – which can be critical in times of external stresses such as flood or drought.

However, the impact of associated benefits from NRM activities cannot always be confirmed through empirical data. To address this knowledge gap, NRM Regions Australia recently commissioned a study that investigated specific NRM strategies that have the most potential to improve drought resilience – both from a social and environmental perspective. The report reviewed farmer responses to a 2015 Regional Wellbeing Survey, which measured resilience as a component of individual wellbeing alongside resilience in the context of farm performance.

The concept of resilience was seen as important as, although having high resilience does not prevent negative impacts in events such as drought, it does help farmers to minimise the size and duration of these impacts.  Resilience, however, is not ‘one size fits all’ approach. How resilient a farm will be depends on a number of factors – such as what is being produced, or external factors such as commodity prices or regional circumstances.

Responses to the survey showed some clear trends. One of the most important actions identified was helping farmers to plan for and manage risk. Other activities that can help farmers cope better with drought include control of feral animals, improved water use efficiency, and supporting graziers to manage groundcover and build feed reserves. However, responses also highlighted areas needing further assessment as some practices that are generally understood to be beneficial were not perceived as improving drought resilience.


The results showed that risk planning, rather than drought planning, was the stronger predictor of drought resilience. This suggests that it is important to engage not just in specific planning for drought but in realistic assessment of the range of risks that could occur on the farm, enabling farmers to better develop strategies to address all risks.


The ACT’s NRM organisation has rolled out several support packages including a grant program to support landholders in on-ground works for drought and climate change preparedness and planning. Funding has supported actions such as fencing to manage stock more effectively and establishing a drought feedlot.

The Regional Agriculture Landcare Facilitator has also provided drought preparedness training and support to landholders via workshops including how to manage stock during dry periods, feed budgeting, grazing management, soil testing, stock management and land use mapping. For highlights from the grants program, click here.


Graziers with a strong focus on maintenance of groundcover have improved resilience to drought. Specific strategies and practices to maintain groundcover vary depending on location, and more analysis is needed (incorporating soil health, water quality and livestock wellbeing and productivity) to identify if some of these are more useful for improving resilience to drought than others  in dry times.


Following a three year perennial pasture demonstration in Manjimup, advice from beef producer Kim Skoss is that preparation is key. While perennials are seen as a solution to maintaining groundcover and reducing the need for supplemental feed, Mr Skoss advises that before sowing perennials, it is important to properly control annual grasses and address fertility issues.

For more information, visit:


Collaborative pest control programs have been a common feature of NRM investment. Report findings suggest that this is an effective strategy in reducing the financial impacts caused to graziers by feral animals during drought.


Image credit: NSW Dept of Primary Industries

Fourteen groups and organisations shared in a $1.5 million 2018 Pest and Weed Drought Funding Program. Funding is supporting a suite of projects across NSW that target pest animal (wild dogs, feral pigs, rabbit, deer) and weed management to build drought resilience.

These projects will help land managers reduce grazing pressure and stock losses caused by pest animals, as well as to manage the spread of weeds. For more information, visit:


Improving water use efficiency has financial benefits for irrigators in drought, as it enables higher volumes of production from lower amounts of water.


The OFIEP provided assistance to communities by funding on-farm irrigation infrastructure modernisation projects. Huge water savings have been made since the program began with reports of reduced leakages since upgrading submains. A strong increase in irrigation efficiency was noted by growers, with those converting from sprinkler irrigation reporting less run off and no longer any need to manually check sprinklers (a labour/time saving). Crop quality also increased with some irrigators noticing an increase in crop yield and crop evenness (less patchy).

For more information, visit:


While not specifically identified in the survey, farmers working together and forming networks are natural consequences of NRM activities (such as workshops or weed control at a landscape level). Where farmers are able to support each other, and share resources and knowledge, overall wellbeing and resilience is improved.


In the Goulburn-Broken Catchment region, farmer Brad Watts has been practicing rotational grazing to help improve his pastures. A relative newcomer to the farming industry, Brad is part of the Yea Soilcare group where a group of local landholders meet regularly to discuss challenges and solutions. The diverse group includes large and small farmers with a range of experience levels.

Through this network, Brad has been able to learn about and trial new ideas, and access workshops and emerging technology. This initiative is helping to improve landholders’ capacity to build strong community networks and prepare for land management challenges. For a full copy of the case study, click here.

The measures used in the study were broad, and future work should use more specific measures to better assess how NRM contributes to drought resilience. However, the study has provided useful data to support evidence that NRM activities have been, and will continue to be, an important tool in responding to the ongoing challenge of drought in Australia. Climate models predict more frequent warmer and drier periods across Australia, and helping farmers better prepare for this eventuality is critical to sustaining our industry. Natural resource management bodies across Australia are responding to this challenge via a range of targeted programs including grants and landholder workshops, and improved soil, water and grazing management. This research report provides additional evidence to support the work already underway, and provides scope for improvements to how such programs are rolled out, communicated, or adapted.

DOWNLOAD: Growing resilience to drought: Natural resource management as a resilience intervention. Kimberly Brown & Jacki Schirmer. Health Research Institute & Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra. October 2018.